The Best of the Best are Highlighted in Red! Various forums, and ourselves as well publish a list of the best drivers. Some are very independent and some are not. Doesn't matter. What our customers are looking for is what are the best driver and shaft combinations that we have fit so far in , even though it is early in the season.
We believe that the shaft is the part of the club that has the most impact on distance, consistency and accuracy, so that is why we are including our shaft recommendations in this list. We have four distinct categories based upon swing speed and distance.
Swing Speed , Distance - yards. Swing Speed 80 - 94, Distance - yards. We think there are more shafts and heads in the mix for slower swing speeds. We have also thrown in our Honorable Mentions in both heads and shafts. So here goes:. Fitting Tips: Typically 65 to 75 gram shafts but smoother tempos can play lighter weights. Firm mid section and low launch, low spin is the norm for more control. Driver lofts 8 to If you think you are losing distance, try a lighter, 55 gram shaft or a counter balanced shaft, but make sure it plays stiff enough.
Typically 9 to These options let the player tweak their club to help create their optimal shot shape and trajectory. It was a great start, but really only allowed for changing shafts. With the callaway razr fit driver our testers averaged Standard, open 2. Back in , the world of golf and its drivers would change forever.
Please note the tool for adjustablity is not included but are widely available. Callaway razr fit driver rh regular flex shaft.
Recently purchased an excellent condition 9. Forged composite in the crown is lighter and stronger than titanium. Shipped with usps priority mail great used shaft for the casual or serious golfer.
Have now been to range a few times and played two rounds. While it might not be for everyone, for those who want the compact size and can swing consistently, this will be a perfect fit. The optifit hosel means that you can adjust the face angle to open, square, or closed. The adjustable hosels allows for the face angle and loft to be changed to suit your swing. We were among the first to test the callaway razr fit driver and we were very impressed as the sound and feel are excellent.
Pin on Golf Clubs. Pin on Golf. Facebook Banner for Great Golf Company. Great shot of. I produce a 95mph swing on average with a slight slice. Any suggestions on a good shaft?
Your email address will not be published. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. The Chicago-based company has been consistently putting out high-quality products, and golfers are really taking notice. The new C driver takes a lot of technology from the EXS line and further refines and expands on it. I know it is a little cliche when companies say every model is their best ever, but Tour Edge is percent right this time.
When unboxing the C the first thing I noticed was the much-improved looks and shape over the previous Tour Edge drivers. The biggest change to my eye is the added bulge, giving a more rounded and softened topline. The overall shape of the C is slightly stretched from front to back, giving it just a hint of a triangular look.
The Ridgeback is a titanium spine flanked by two carbon fiber wings that add stability and forgiveness to the head, but they can also work together and an additional aiming device to ensure you are lined up down the center of the fairway. Getting the C out on the course is where you really start to appreciate all the technology that went into this driver.
Well-struck shots are very long, very boring, and will hang with anything out on the market today. Center contact is rewarded with a long and very low spin shot that is just fun to hit.
The sound and feel are very solid, you can really feel the ball compress on the face as it leaves at high speed. The sound is more of a muted crack and much quieter than I anticipated. If you practice on an enclosed range your ears will thank you for your choice in drivers. Shots hit away from the center of the face retain a lot of ball speed and stay online really well.
My miss is low on the heel and those misses stayed in the air fairly well and went a good ways. Shots hit down on the heel or higher on the toe side still stay online really well due to the Ridgeback spine and rear weight.
The C is just slightly higher than mid-launch for me, but the low spinning head never allowed my shots to balloon or rise even into the wind. I do wish the face was just a touch deeper as I had to play with my tee height in order to find the optimal setup. The better players will enjoy the neutral weighting and there seems to be very minimal draw built into the driver.
Overall, the Tour Edge Exotics C driver is a great club that will probably be overlooked by too many golfers. If you are looking for added distance, a lot of forgiveness and want to keep some money in your pocket, then you should seriously take a look at Tour Edge.
Super low-spin drivers were all the rage at the time. With their forward center of gravity, they were helping golfers optimize their launch conditions beyond their wildest dreams: crazy high launch, ridiculously low spin.
Many in the business, including myself, had one of these drivers and spent many launch monitor sessions trying to figure out how to get more distance from these high knuckleballs. The bad news was that forward-CG drivers, by nature, were really unforgiving.
Bad shots were really short and crooked. Its CG was located as low and as rearward in the driver head as possible, which he said would offer the best of both worlds: optimized launch conditions on good shots, as well as the best possible forgiveness on bad shots. Building the perfect driver was a long way off and still is , but Jertson was excited where Ping had landed with the G When it was released , the driver was a powerful testament to his vision.
Its rear-CG design created great distance on good and bad shots, and it was also a very straight driver. The G30 sold incredibly well and, as a result, the industry mostly shifted away from forward-CG drivers. The company shrunk the size of its new G drivers in a climate where full-size drivers have become the norm. Despite their slimmer frames, however, the G drivers are actually more forgiving than the G drivers which were even more forgiving than the G The drivers have the lowest, most rearward CG of any Ping drivers ever, and their smaller size is said to improve their aerodynamics so golfers can swing them fractionally faster.
I hit five shots with each driver on Trackman IV, and to ensure as much of an apples-to-apples comparison as possible, I tested each driver head with the same shaft. Each driver head was adjusted to the same loft, or as close as possible. The G LST had a loft of 10 degrees, and it was adjusted to 9. Improvements generally come in the form of improved head shaping, a better feel, or enhanced adjustability.
That led to a significant improvement in distance. With my swing speed and ball speed staying about the same, I added an average of 7. I saw an average of a 1. The result was an average of 6. It was the longest and straightest driver I hit in the test. One way to explain the improved launch conditions is that I hit the G drivers more consistently. Is that its slightly enhanced forgiveness shining through? Maybe, maybe not. To me, the changes Ping made to the look and feel of the driver were just as important as the performance difference I saw on Trackman.
For that reason, I felt more confident with the G drivers in my hands. I was sold on the looks alone. I also preferred the sound of the G drivers to the G drivers. Looks and feel are subjective, of course, but to me the improvement was night and day. I do want readers to keep in mind that this was a one-person test and I hit a limited amount of balls. I also want to address the weaknesses of the G drivers. A bigger deal for some golfers might be the G crowns. Maybe the improved forgiveness will show up on a launch monitor or on the course.
What determines the best driver on the market; is it the opinion of professional club fitters, professional golfers or testing results from a group of amateurs? At GolfWRX, we believe all three sources can lead golfers to an answer. Being a website founded by passionate golfers with a mission to serve passionate golfers, though, we place a special emphasis on the opinions of our GolfWRX Members — the most knowledgeable group of golfers on the planet. No other group of golfers in the world tests golf clubs as frequently or as extensively as GolfWRX Members.
So who better to poll to get an initial indication of the best performing drivers so far in ? You can see the results below as of the first three weeks of voting , as well as quotes we pulled from GolfWRX Members about the drivers from our forum. Stay tuned! As this list indicates, however, some drivers are working better than others this year. Happy Testing! Driver: Srixon ZX5 9.
Connect with us. Share Tweet. Your Reaction? Related Topics: Callaway drivers. Mona Jan 12, at am. Reply Report comment. Sharon Dec 8, at am. Different Crafts: Limitless crafts will be pursued utilizing the cones alone. Kapsul Daun Sirsak Nov 17, at am. A must read post! Keith Dec 1, at pm.
Huizinga Oct 5, at pm. I will let you guys know the difference between old and this modern driver… Man, Handicap Gill Jul 25, at am.
0コメント