Mate in one move using king and knight Checkmate the black king with your knight, king and pawn! Mate in one move using rook, king and pawn Checkmate the black king with your rook, king and pawn! Mate in one move using queen, king and pawns Checkmate the black king with your queen, king and pawns! Mate in one move using king and pawns Checkmate the black king with your pawns! Use pawn promotion when possible. Mate in one move using king and two bishops Checkmate the black king with your bishop pair and king!
Page 1 - Checkmate-in-One Answers. Page 2 - Checkmate-in-One Answers. Page 3 - Checkmate-in-One Answers. Page 1 - Checkmate-in-Two Problems. Page 2 - Checkmate-in-Two Problems. Page 1 - Checkmate-in-Two Answers. Page 2 - Checkmate-in-Two Answers.
Page 1 - Checkmate-in-Three Problems. Page 2 - Checkmate-in-Three Problems. Page 1 - Checkmate-in-Three Answers. This website does not own the rules of chess and the solving of puzzles. There is no pride in conspiring with chess. Btw, this diagram is much better than those posted earlier with the same idea because it is a legal diagram in itself.
Something positive in the end! Because the OP wrote that the puzzle was white to play and mate in 1, it can be deduced through the process of elimination, that the solution must be gxf6. As no other solutions could exist. Good thought! It is possible to postulate that knowing there is a solution is part of the conditions of solving. This is however not considered valid thought for chess puzzles in general. Note that I could for instance make puzzles which are only solvable when you rotate the board 90, or degrees.
Is it fair to assume that solvers will investigate those options when they can't find a solution? Therefore it is agreed that you cannot assume a puzzle is solvable in order to solve it. The point is that there are already additional conventions to help you decide on unknown states such as e. The makers of these weird puzzles just choose to forget about them and make their own rules. What you fail to notice is that those who complain about some puzzles are also the ones who most enjoy some of the others.
What makes puzzles attractive is quality not deception. Puzzles symbolize perfection in chess and are for those who seek beauty in perfection. I have no clue what most of the folks on this forum are doing today. Why don't they go somewhere else? There is also chesskids. I was not trying to imply that people who find this puzzle amusing are better than those who complain about it. I was merely pointing out that almost all people who see this puzzle will either think it is funny or say that the en passant rule is not legal because the previous move wasn't shown.
Also, this puzzle was made with the intent of creating a joke puzzle. KnightAttack : Thank you for appreciating my own joke puzzle!
0コメント